2 min read 300 words 7 links

Thinking in Systems

#systemsthinking

Metadata

Highlights

Some interconnections in systems are actual physical flows, such as the water in the tree’s trunk or the students progressing through a university. Many interconnections are flows of information—signals that go to decision points or action points within a system. These kinds of interconnections are often harder to see, but the system reveals them to those who look. — location: 354 ^ref-37714


Systems can be nested within systems. Therefore, there can be purposes within purposes. — location: 385 ^ref-49361


Stocks change over time through the actions of a flow. Flows are filling and draining, births and deaths, purchases and sales, growth and decay, deposits and withdrawals, successes and failures. A stock, then, is the present memory of the history of changing flows within the system. — location: 432 ^ref-26028


You’ll be thinking not in terms of a static world, but a dynamic one. You’ll stop looking for who’s to blame; instead you’ll start asking, “What’s the system?” The concept of feedback opens up the idea that a system can cause its own behavior. — location: 695 ^ref-24283


There’s an important general principle here, and also one specific to the thermostat structure. First the general one: The information delivered by a feedback loop can only affect future behavior; it can’t deliver the information, and so can’t have an impact fast enough to correct behavior that drove the current feedback. A person in the system who makes a decision based on the feedback can’t change the behavior of the system that drove the current feedback; the decisions he or she makes will affect only future behavior. — location: 770 ^ref-26576


One-time Support

Amount$5.00
$1$100

Every bit matters. Thank you!

Cryptocurrency

BTC
3DE42VUyUKSikQ9eUeFKv2EkKVms7Pmd1G
ETH
0x63958715F8e9Fd6CF0652394a89bb2AdD0a11686
SOL
97V8rDTyHuL1oTTt3qC3oUXckTKSQVM7Fhd3rj5692cL